* feat(review): configurable AO code review backend (V1)
Add per-project configurable code review of a worker's PR. A reviewer
agent runs one-shot over the worker's own worktree and posts its result
to the PR; the worker picks the feedback up through the existing SCM
observer review-nudge path.
- domain: ProjectConfig.reviewers (+ default reviewer harness), Review /
ReviewRun types and verdict/status vocab.
- storage: review + review_run tables (0011), sqlc queries, store methods.
- service/review: rewrite the in-memory stub as a persisted ReviewService
(Trigger/Submit/List) with a reviewer Runner over agent resolver +
runtime; ports.PRReviewPoster implemented on the GitHub adapter.
- http: session-scoped routes POST /sessions/{id}/reviews/trigger,
POST .../submit, GET .../reviews; regenerated OpenAPI + TS types.
- cli: ao review trigger|submit|list.
- frontend: adapt ReviewDashboard to the per-worker reviews API.
Closes#192
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* refactor(review): address review — drop submit/poster/CLI, default reviewer to worker harness
Per PR #197 review feedback:
- Reviewer agent posts its review to the PR itself, so remove the
ports.PRReviewPoster port, the GitHub review poster, the submit HTTP
route + DTO, and the service Submit method (#1, #4, #7).
- Trigger spawns the reviewer agent over the worker's worktree with its
own review prompt, mirroring the session launch flow (resolve agent by
harness -> argv -> runtime.Create) (#8, #9).
- Default reviewer harness reuses the worker's harness when supported,
falling back to claude-code; reviewer config stays independent of the
worker override (#5, #6).
- Drop the `ao review` CLI for this PR's scope (#2, #3).
Regenerated OpenAPI + TS types.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat(review): restore ao review submit (records verdict+body in AO)
Per maintainer request, bring back `ao review submit`. AO records the
reviewer's verdict and body on the review_run and marks the pass complete;
it does not post to GitHub — the reviewer agent posts its review to the PR
itself.
- storage: add review_run.body (0011), persist via Insert/UpdateReviewRunResult.
- service: restore Submit (no SCM poster) storing verdict + body.
- http: restore POST /sessions/{id}/reviews/submit + SubmitReviewInput.
- cli: ao review submit [worker] --verdict --body (worker from arg/--session/$AO_REVIEW_WORKER).
- runner: reviewer prompt instructs posting to GitHub and recording via ao review submit.
Regenerated OpenAPI + TS types.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* refactor(review): move reviewer runner to its own package; sharpen prompt
Per PR #197 review:
- Move the concrete reviewer runner out of the service layer into a new
internal/review_runner package (package reviewrunner), beside other
orchestration packages like session_manager. The service keeps only the
Runner interface + RunSpec it depends on; the agent-resolver + runtime
launch flow lives in review_runner.
- Sharpen the reviewer prompt: tell the agent to diff against the PR base,
focus on high-confidence findings, post via `gh pr review`, and record
the result with `ao review submit`; review-only (no commits/edits).
- Add unit tests for the runner.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* refactor(review): simplify review_run schema; provider-agnostic reviewer prompt
Per PR #197 review:
- review_run: status default 'running' (drop 'pending'), drop CHECK
constraints on status/verdict, drop the updated_at column and the
session/iteration index. Propagated through queries, domain, store,
service, and tests.
- Reviewer prompt no longer hardcodes GitHub/gh commands — it instructs the
agent to use whatever review tooling the provider offers, keeping the
flow extensible across SCM providers.
Regenerated sqlc + OpenAPI/TS.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* refactor(review): launch reviewer before persisting the run
Trigger now spawns the reviewer agent first and then writes the review_run
with a status derived from the launch outcome (running on success, failed
if it never started), instead of inserting a running row and correcting it
to failed afterwards.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* refactor(review): pluggable reviewer registry distinct from worker harnesses
Reviewers are now their own pluggable adapter set, separate from the worker
agent registry — adding a reviewer (claude-code today, greptile tomorrow) is
a one-line registration that does not widen the worker harness vocabulary,
and a worker harness does not automatically become a valid reviewer.
- domain.ReviewerHarness: a distinct vocabulary (AllReviewerHarnesses) with
its own IsKnown; ReviewerConfig/Review/ReviewRun use it. ResolveReviewerHarness
reuses the worker harness only when it is itself a supported reviewer, else
falls back to claude-code.
- ports.Reviewer: a reviewer-specific contract (ReviewCommand → argv + env)
that models one-shot / non-prompt CLIs natively instead of forcing every
reviewer through the worker's interactive GetLaunchCommand(Prompt:...).
- internal/adapters/reviewer: a separate registry + resolver (mirrors the
worker agent registry) with the claude-code reviewer adapter, which owns the
review prompt and reuses the worker claude-code launch construction.
- review_runner resolves via the reviewer registry (not the worker
AgentResolver) and merges AO_REVIEW_WORKER into the adapter's env.
- daemon wires the reviewer resolver. Registry/domain parity is test-enforced.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test(review): cover run-scoped reviewer submit
* fix(api): update generated review submit schema
* refactor(review): split core engine (internal/review) from API service
Move the review orchestration (Trigger/Submit/List, run-id generation,
deps, RunSpec/Runner, sentinels) into a transport-independent core package
internal/review (Engine). internal/service/review is now a thin API-flow
boundary: the controller-facing Manager interface + a Service that delegates
to the engine + error re-exports.
This keeps the service layer to API concerns and lets the same engine back a
future in-process CLI trigger without going through HTTP. review_runner now
depends on the core package; daemon builds the engine and wraps it in the
service. No API/schema changes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat(review): commit-aware trigger, reviewer handle for UI, no env vars
Reworks the review trigger lifecycle and drops env-based coupling:
- review_run gains target_sha (the reviewed commit) and drops iteration.
A repeat trigger for the same PR head short-circuits to the existing run.
- review gains reviewer_handle_id: the live reviewer pane's runtime handle,
reused across passes and exposed in the reviews API so the UI can attach
its terminal over /mux.
- Trigger flow: if a live reviewer pane exists and a new commit arrived,
message it to re-review; otherwise spawn a fresh reviewer. The run is
recorded only after the reviewer is launched.
- No environment variables: the reviewer adapter embeds the explicit
`ao review submit --session <w> --run <id>` command in the spawn prompt
and the re-review message. CLI submit requires --run/--session (no env
fallbacks).
- Merge review_runner into internal/review as a Launcher (spawn/notify/alive).
- Trigger returns 201 for a new pass, 200 when reusing an existing run.
Regenerated sqlc + OpenAPI/TS.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* refactor(review): author the reviewer prompt centrally, not in the adapter
Mirror the worker model (session_manager builds the prompt; adapters just
place it via LaunchConfig.Prompt). The reviewer prompt now lives in
internal/review/prompt.go and is passed through ports.ReviewInvocation.Prompt;
the claude-code reviewer adapter just feeds inv.Prompt to its launch command
and returns it as the re-review message. One-shot CLI reviewers may ignore it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* refactor(review): split reviewer prompt into system+task, mirroring buildSpawnTexts
Mirror session_manager.buildSpawnTexts for the reviewer: a standing role goes
in the system prompt, the per-pass task (PR/commit + exact `ao review submit`
command) goes in the user prompt. internal/review/prompt.go now returns
(prompt, systemPrompt); both flow through ports.ReviewInvocation and the
claude-code adapter places them via LaunchConfig{Prompt, SystemPrompt}. The
re-review message reuses the per-pass prompt (role already established in the
running pane).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Vaibhaav <user@example.com>
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
da30da5a45